“The spike protein, which extends outward from the body of the virus and modulates the binding and fusion of the virus with the human cells, has components that appear to be unique to SARS-CoV-2 and not a consequence of a normal evolutionary process.” (Updates at IMO below.)

Peter Daszak Eco-Fascist Who Orchestrated Global Pandemic

Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance repurposed grants to Wuhan Insistitue of Virology for the Gain-of-Threat experiments on bat viruses causing Covid-19 Pandemic.

Read More

peterdaszak.com

Rutgers professor says new Fauci revelations prove he endangered the public

Dr. Richard Ebright, a vocal opponent of gain-of-function
research, said the data proved the NIAID, under Fauci’s
leadership, violated federal policies, endangered the public and
lied to the public.

Read More

thepostmillennial.com

“COVID: summary of lab-origin hypothesis: 1) Pandemic caused by a bat SARS-like coronavirus emerged in Wuhan–a city 1,000 miles from nearest wild bats with SARS-like coronaviruses, but that contains labs conducting world’s largest research program on bat SARS-like coronaviruses.” – Dr. Richard H. Ebright, Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Research, Rutgers University

CONFIRMED – COVID is Man-Made & Fauci, Bill Gates, Daszak & Moderna are responsible

The US government funded Peter Daszak’s ECO Health Alliance to the tune of $61,491,183 to make new coronaviruses that are infectious to humans. It also directly or indirectly funding the Wuha…

Read More

expose-news.com

This letter below published by the Lancet (Prompted by Dr. Fauci. Lancet one of the few left-leaning ‘scientific’ journals imo) was then used to suppress and censor the Chinese lab leak theory in Mainstream Media and on ‘big tic social media’ for over a year. There was, and remains, no evidence for the “scientists’” claims:

An appeal for an objective, open, and transparent scientific debate about the origin of SARS-CoV-2

On July 5, 2021, a Correspondence was published in The Lancet called “Science, not
speculation, is essential to determine how SARS-CoV-2 reached humans”.1 The letter
recapitulates the arguments of an earlier letter (published in February, 2020) by
the same authors,2 which claimed overwhelming suppor…

Read More

www.thelancet.com

“… direct evidence for a natural origin for SARS-CoV-2 is missing. After 19 months of investigations, the proximal progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 is still lacking. Neither the host pathway from bats to humans, nor the geographical route from Yunnan (where the viruses most closely related to SARS-CoV-2 have been sampled) to Wuhan (where the pandemic emerged) have been identified. More than 80,000 samples collected from Chinese wildlife sites and animal farms all proved negative. In addition, the international research community has no access to the sites, samples, or raw data …

Some unusual features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence suggest that they may have resulted from genetic engineering, an approach widely used in some virology labs.

Alternatively, adaptation to humans might result from undirected laboratory selection during serial passage in cell cultures or laboratory animals, including humanised mice.Mice genetically modified to display the human receptor for entry of SARS-CoV-2 (ACE2) were used in research projects funded before the pandemic, to test the infectivity of different virus strains. Laboratory research also includes more targeted approaches such as gain-of-function experiments relying on chimeric viruses to test their potential to cross species barriers.

A research-related contamination could result from contact with a natural virus during field collection, transportation from the field to a laboratory, characterisation of bats and bat viruses in a laboratory, or from a non-natural virus modified in a laboratory. There are well-documented cases of pathogen escapes from laboratories.”